<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Agenda questions help the team stay on track</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lyssaadkins.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/agenda-questions-help-the-team-stay-on-track/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lyssaadkins.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/agenda-questions-help-the-team-stay-on-track/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:07:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lyssaadkins</title>
		<link>http://lyssaadkins.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/agenda-questions-help-the-team-stay-on-track/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>lyssaadkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lyssaadkins.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Peter -
I love your approach to detecting whether the deviation is really a deviation or just the right place for the team to go, in the moment, in service of their goals.  You have hit the nail on the head - powerful questions.  This is a good technique to use when shining light on what looks to be a deviation.  See my earlier post on Powerful Questions (April 2008) for more on this.

As you imagined, an advanced move one can use is &quot;calling the team forth&quot; (another co-achive coaching technique).  This is when you intuit the team is skirting the real problem.     

Thanks for adding your wisdom to this post.  And thanks for the compliments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter -<br />
I love your approach to detecting whether the deviation is really a deviation or just the right place for the team to go, in the moment, in service of their goals.  You have hit the nail on the head &#8211; powerful questions.  This is a good technique to use when shining light on what looks to be a deviation.  See my earlier post on Powerful Questions (April 2008) for more on this.</p>
<p>As you imagined, an advanced move one can use is &#8220;calling the team forth&#8221; (another co-achive coaching technique).  This is when you intuit the team is skirting the real problem.     </p>
<p>Thanks for adding your wisdom to this post.  And thanks for the compliments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://lyssaadkins.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/agenda-questions-help-the-team-stay-on-track/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lyssaadkins.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Lyssa,

No doubt that this technique could be very powerful. I haven&#039;t tried it yet, but will do that.

But do you need it to tackle the problem you raised: how to be sure if the team is deviating or not? And also your second question: is this &quot;deviation&quot; a deviation? I am personally always reluctant when trying to resolve such hard questions with simple techniques. Aren&#039;t we working around the real problem we really face?

Have you considered to ask at such moment (not necessarily referring to the agenda): &quot;What question are we trying to answer now?&quot;  In a second stage, and if still needed, you may then ask secondary questions like &quot;How does this relate to the core problem we want to solve?&quot; or/and &quot;Is this a priority question now?&quot;

PS I love your contributions - mainly your YouTube is really great. Hope to meet one day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lyssa,</p>
<p>No doubt that this technique could be very powerful. I haven&#8217;t tried it yet, but will do that.</p>
<p>But do you need it to tackle the problem you raised: how to be sure if the team is deviating or not? And also your second question: is this &#8220;deviation&#8221; a deviation? I am personally always reluctant when trying to resolve such hard questions with simple techniques. Aren&#8217;t we working around the real problem we really face?</p>
<p>Have you considered to ask at such moment (not necessarily referring to the agenda): &#8220;What question are we trying to answer now?&#8221;  In a second stage, and if still needed, you may then ask secondary questions like &#8220;How does this relate to the core problem we want to solve?&#8221; or/and &#8220;Is this a priority question now?&#8221;</p>
<p>PS I love your contributions &#8211; mainly your YouTube is really great. Hope to meet one day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
